These three pieces of information enabled Bridget's family to be traced in the census returns. Parents James and Ann were both born in Ireland and they had ten children in 22 years (1876-1898) - Bridget (the eldest), Kate, Mary, Patrick, Annie, Ellen, Sarah, Jane, Maggie and Jemima.
The dark clothes and solemn expressions indicated that the occasion of the photograph was a funeral. Could the central figure holding a bible or prayer book be Ann? Was the young girl carrying flowers the youngest daughter Jemima? The style of dress and the possible age of the girl could date the photograph to the early 20th century c.1910.
The estimated date of the photograph was confirmed by tracing father James’ death online to October 6th 1912.
This was indeed a McFarlane family photograph.
Death certificates on ScotlandsPeople
are brilliant source material as they give more information than their
English equivalent - notably the names of the deceased's parents -
provided of course that the informant knows these details.
So I learnt that Jame McFarlane, married to Ann Laughlan, was a railway surfaceman, aged 53 when he died of bronchitis at 24 Campbell Street, Dunfermline, Fife - the informant his son Patrick McFarlane of 57 Arthur Street, Cowdenbeath, Fife.
James' parents, both deceased, were named on the certificate as Patrick McFarlane, a quarry labourer and Bridget McFarlane, maiden surname Phee - though I did wonder could this have been the more usual surname of McPhee? So James and Ann's eldest (and only) son and eldest daughter were named after their paternal grandparents.
But the photograph above remains a potent symbol of a family coming together at a time of mourning.
Adapted from a post first published in 2010, with thanks to my friend Edna (now sadly deceased) for allowing me to feature this photograph.
************
Click HERE to read tales from other Sepia Saturday bloggers
This was a perfect photo for our Sepia theme and a great genealogy detective story too. It must have been a great burden for Ann to lose her husband so young. Today we easily take photos of everyone and anything, but we need to remember that back in olden times a photo was often taken to commemorate a special occasion, even sad ones.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Mike, for your thoughtful and sympathetic comment.
DeleteMike - my comment above from Susan Donaldson (Scotsue)
ReplyDeleteGood work figuring out who these people were, and why they gathered to have a photo taken. I do hope they had some photos taken at more cheerful occaisions, like weddings. Who knows.
ReplyDeleteNice work for your friend. I'm sure she's appreciative to learn something about her family. It's a shame photo's are so often not identified. I know we have some in the family like that as well. It's been awhile since I've worked on my family tree, but do enjoy it, and have had fun connecting with distant family members, particularly on my Dad's side. His family hales from Germany. Was out blog walking this morning and found myself here. It's always fun to meet new bloggers, hope you'll swing by for a visit.
ReplyDelete