Sepia Saturday's June theme is "Crowds" with this week's prompt a vintage photograph of a suffragette march. I am taking a look at local history and how the movement was active, not just in major cities, but also in a rural corner of Scotland.
Rise, ye men of Border burghs.
Show yourself in your true colours
"The Hawick Express" of February 26th 1909 reported that:
"The Suffragists are extremely busy in connection with the elections and have taken a shop on the High Street as their headquarters,,,,,the window is smartly decorated with suffragette literature and pictures and they are reported to be doing a roaring trade in the sale of "Votes for Women" badges".Mrs Pankhurst returned to Hawick in August 1909 when she called on women to join a large demonstration in Edinburgh.
"The Jedburgh Advertiser”: October 3rd described the plans for the
visit. These included the erection of a tent, measuring 220 feet by
60 feet with seating accommodation for about 4000 people - this when the
population of Earlston in the 1911 census was only 1677! (How
many political meetings in the Borders attract that kind of number today?) Houses and shops were being painted and decorated and made to look their
best. Five special trains to Earlston were bringing passengers from further afield.
- Preparations along Earlston High Street, 1908
The Language used to Describe the Suffragettes
The threat of demonstrations was a serious preoccupation for the organisers as evidenced by the press coverage, which used such terms as "the dreaded suffragettes", “pernicious feminine politicians”, “militant political women” “displaying their usual offensive manners”, and "mischievously disposed females."
Rumours abounded that suffragettes
would follow in motor cars the Prime Minister’s
party to Earlston, with the waving of flags
and banners and shouts of their motto” Votes or Women” and the approach of the picturesque
procession to the various villages along the way being heralded by the
ringing of bells. In the event the Prime Minister arrived by train.
Prime Minister Asquith arriving at Earlston Station, 1908
The strategy
of the event organisers was to sit all ladies attending the event in a
specially designated part of the marquee;
or as “The Sheffield Daily Telegraph” said “Put the
Ladies in a Compound” –
Ladies would not be admitted to any other part of the building even if they possessed tickets for other parts. “The purpose of this arrangement is evident”. Names and addresses were also required , This precaution is specially intended to keep out any suffragettes who may attempt to be present and carry out their policy in their usual offensive manner.”
“The Daily Record” of 26th Sept 1908 noted:
“The decision that they must ail
sit together has been arrived at, is
scarcely necessary to say, because of the probability of a suffragette
disturbance. With the women in a bunch, it is believed that any
need for ejection will be the more easier accomplished than if the ladies were
dotted all over the marquee”.
T"The Southern Reporter noted that the local motto of suffragettes was “Ask Asquith with All Your Might"
The Prime Minister’s Visit
When Mr Asquith stood to speak "He got a warm greeting. Many of the people rose to their feet and waved hats and handkerchiefs and cheered with great cordiality".
“The interrupter was a young woman of graceful figure and pleasant features,
and, having borne her testimony, she smiled and waited. She had not to wait
long before she was attended to. One of the stewards quickly realised the
situation. Ah., ha, here you are, are you", he seemed to say, and he made his
way to the fair suffragette. She was calm
and unresisting, but with her sailor hat
somewhat awry , and they a little excited and very energetic, but not
severe.
As far as one could judge the suffragette had no confederates beside
her, for
the ladies in whose all she stood appeared most surprised of all when
the demand for their civil emancipation came from their midst, and
there not a flutter
among them while the furbelows that had been ruffled were re-arranged.
Of course they were cruel men who shouted "Put her out". She didn't
care - she had done what she could.
The Jedburgh reporter (above) clearly found this incident far more interesting than Mr Asquih's speech whcih he descibed as "Impassioned with no striking phrases."
“The Huntly Express” (an Aberdeenshire paper) referred to
“the stylishly-dressed young suffragette,
who within a few seconds was in the arms
of a stalwart Gala steward, and was borne out amid the laughter of the audience.
She appeared to be the only one of her kind who had succeeded in effecting an
entrance, and the Prime Minister proceeded without further interruption”.
The “Votes for Women”, publication in London not surprisingly gave a different slant on the incident:
“In spite of the most elaborate
precautions to exclude any but ardent supporters, a woman found her way into
Mr. Asquith's meeting at Earlston, and at an early stage in the proceedings
protested that he ought to give votes to qualified women. She was, of course,
ejected after considerable uproar, being followed by a large crowd, who were
evidently more interested in the Suffragettes than in the Prime Minister.
Meanwhile, a man who interrupted the speaker several times was left in
undisturbed possession of his seat.”
"The Berwickshire News": 10th August 1909 printed the following report:
The women were conveyed to Jedburgh and apprehended before the Sheriff. A big crowd collected in the vicinity of the court room to catch a glimpse of the daring but mischievously disposed females."
their family history and memories through photographs
Thanks for sharing this history on the women's suffrage movement in Earlston. It's very interesting to compare how women secured civil rights in Britain with how suffrage was attained in the U.S. Considering the upcoming elections in both countries, I'm sure politicians will resort to controlling protest demonstrations with the same tactics of entry tickets, confinement, security "bouncers", and secret agents that were used in 1908. Unfortunately the old adage is true. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
ReplyDeleteThis is quite a post! I think you touched on just about every basic area concerning the women's suffrage movement. I applaud your effort! :)
ReplyDeleteWhat a wonderful post about a particular place which dealt with the women's movement to obtain votes. I'm glad that certain women received the right to vote in 1918, and the rest (equal to men) in 1928. Those ten years must have been hard to live with, a lot of women could vote, but I'd say maybe a majority of women still couldn't. (University education for women in early 20th Century England? REALLY!)
ReplyDelete